Thursday, November 5, 2026Independent · Fact-checked · Human-edited
header-leaderboard
AAnonymous+ FollowUS News

Trump defends Education Department job cuts, says states should run schools

Story by Olivia Wildheart · · 4 min read
Published Mar 14, 2025, 8:12 pm ET · Updated Oct 29, 2026, 3:52 am ET

Trump defends Education Department job cuts, says states should run schools
0 shares24 views
article-top-mobile

President Trump defended his administration’s plan to cut nearly half of the Education Department’s workforce, including about 1,300 layoffs, saying U.S. students lag behind peers in countries such as China, Norway, Denmark and Sweden and that states should run education.

The Education Department announced about 1,300 layoffs, part of a reduction that will cut nearly half of its staff.

Trump defends Education Department job cuts

President Donald Trump on Wednesday defended his administration’s decision to cut nearly half of the jobs at the U.S. Department of Education. He said the move is about improving American education and returning control to the states.

Advertisement

Trump said students in the United States are falling behind students in other countries, naming China, Norway, Denmark and Sweden, and argued that education should be run by states rather than from Washington.

Why Trump says the cuts are needed

The department announced this week that it would lay off about 1,300 employees. Trump pointed to international rankings in reading, math and science to argue that the current system is not working, and said states should be in charge of their own schools.

Speaking at the White House, Trump said:

“We have a dream. And you know what the dream is? We’re going to move the Department of Education. We’re going to move education into the states, so that the states, instead of bureaucrats working in Washington, can run education.”

in-article-2

What it would mean in practice

Under Trump’s approach, states such as Texas, California and Florida would have more say over curriculum, testing and teacher support. The federal department currently administers major funding programs, oversees student aid and enforces civil rights laws in schools.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon’s position

Education Secretary Linda McMahon has supported reducing the size of the department. In a statement announcing the layoffs, she said the reduction “reflects the Department of Education’s commitment to efficiency, accountability, and ensuring that resources are directed where they matter most: to students, parents, and teachers.”

What happens next

The cuts come as Trump is expected to sign an executive order aimed at winding down the department. Fully closing the department would require action by Congress, because it was created by federal law.

in-article-3

Supporters

Conservative groups and advocates of state control over education have welcomed the plan. They argue that local leaders are better placed to decide what students learn and how teachers are trained, and that a smaller federal role would give families more choices.

Critics

Democrats, teachers’ unions and many education advocates oppose the move. They say the federal government plays an important role in protecting students’ civil rights and supporting public schools, and they warn that cuts could hurt students in low-income communities and students with disabilities who rely on federal programs.


Areas that could be affected

If the department is significantly reduced, changes could reach several areas, including:

  • Standardized testing and data collection
  • Federal funding for low-income schools
  • Special education support
  • Civil rights enforcement in schools
  • Federal student aid administration
Advertisement

Supporters say some states could improve their systems with more control, while critics say gaps between states could widen.


Why it matters

The Department of Education was created by a law signed in 1979 and began operating in 1980. Cutting its staff in half, or eliminating it, would be one of the largest changes to federal education policy in decades and would affect millions of students, teachers and families.


Summary

  • The Education Department is laying off about 1,300 workers as part of a plan to cut nearly half of its staff.
  • Trump says states, not Washington, should run education.
  • Supporters say the change will make schools more efficient and save money.
  • Opponents say it could hurt students and reduce equal access to education.
  • Closing the department entirely would require approval from Congress.
in-article-5

Source: WTTW News (AP)

0 shares24 views

Comments 0

after-article

This story was reported and edited by the Anonymous Group Inc newsroom under our editorial standards. Spotted an error? See our corrections policy or contact us.

Olivia Wildheart
About the author

Olivia Wildheart is a 43-year-old journalist and writer with over 20 years of experience contributing to national newspapers and lifestyle magazines. Throughout her career, she has covered stories on contemporary culture, travel, and personal profile pieces, developing a reputation for sharp observations and engaging narratives. When she is not working on her next writing project, Olivia enjoys exploring coastal trails and photographing local architecture.

Up next: gallery →Miley Cyrus is helping build new housing for homeless women
Miley Cyrus is helping build new housing for homeless women
The Anonymous NewsletterThe day's top stories, fact-checked and edited by humans. Free, in your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. See our Privacy Policy.

Follow Anonymous for more stories like this

Leave a Comment

By posting you agree to our Terms of Use. Abusive, hateful or sexual comments are not allowed and are removed. Use Report on any comment, or Block to hide a person. Contact: Contact us.

The Anonymous NewsletterThe day's top stories, fact-checked and edited by humans. Free, in your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. See our Privacy Policy.

mobile-anchor