Saturday, October 24, 2026Independent · Fact-checked · Human-edited
header-leaderboard
AAnonymous+ FollowAnimals

What the PACT Act Actually Covers, and Where It Stops

Story by Olivia Wildheart · · 2 min read
Published Aug 23, 2026, 8:23 pm ET · Updated Oct 24, 2026, 6:56 am ET

What the PACT Act Actually Covers, and Where It Stops

AI-generated illustration | AIAC

0 shares2 views
article-top-mobile

The PACT Act, signed on November 25, 2019, created the first general federal statute against acts of animal cruelty, closing a gap left by a 2010 law on crush videos. Codified at 18 U.S.C. 48, it bans purposeful crushing, burning, drowning, suffocating and impaling that seriously injures animals.

Where the PACT Act Stops

Animal cruelty has been punishable under state law in all fifty states for decades, but until 2019 there was no general federal statute against the acts themselves. A 2010 law banned the creation and distribution of so-called animal crush videos while leaving the underlying abuse outside federal reach. The Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture Act, signed on 25 November 2019, closed that gap. Codified at 18 U.S.C. § 48, it criminalises purposeful conduct including crushing, burning, drowning, suffocating and impaling when that conduct causes serious bodily injury to a living non-human mammal, bird, reptile or amphibian.

The law reaches less far than its headlines suggest, because federal jurisdiction is a threshold question in every case. The statute applies when conduct occurs on federally owned or controlled property such as national parks and military installations, within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or when it affects interstate or foreign commerce. Cruelty contained entirely within one state, with no federal connection, falls outside the Act and is left to state prosecutors. Fish, insects and other invertebrates are not covered. Congress also wrote in exemptions for lawful activity including veterinary care and scientific research.

Advertisement

Penalties run to seven years imprisonment, a fine, or both. Two limits are worth understanding. The statute does not preempt state or local animal welfare law, so state charges remain available regardless. And no mechanism compels a federal prosecutor to take a qualifying case, which means outcomes still depend heavily on the strength of the state statute where the abuse occurred.


Source: GBH News (NPR)

0 shares2 views

Comments 0

after-article

This story was reported and edited by the Anonymous Group Inc newsroom under our editorial standards. Spotted an error? See our corrections policy or contact us.

Olivia Wildheart
About the author

Olivia Wildheart is a 43-year-old journalist and writer with over 20 years of experience contributing to national newspapers and lifestyle magazines. Throughout her career, she has covered stories on contemporary culture, travel, and personal profile pieces, developing a reputation for sharp observations and engaging narratives. When she is not working on her next writing project, Olivia enjoys exploring coastal trails and photographing local architecture.

Up next: gallery →Cinco the Jaguar Keeps Coming Back to Arizona: 14 Facts About This Rare Wild Cat
Cinco the Jaguar Keeps Coming Back to Arizona: 14 Facts About This Rare Wild Cat
Follow Anonymous for more stories like this

Leave a Comment

mobile-anchor